« Romeo and Juliet in June | Main | CusackPoe »
Saturday
Apr282012

Poe's pet raccoon

As a literary historian, the CusackPoe Raven was an unmitigated disaster, trotting out the same old drunk, drug-addled madman Poe that has bedeviled pop culture for far too long.  It's not even bold anymore.  It's just boring.  And to make him a loser, to boot, in amystery thriller, just adds further insult to injury.  

But that's the review of a literary historian, someone with a serious investment in the way Poe is received and read by culture.  Does that mean the entire movie is bad?  Well, while I don't think the movie is very good on it's own terms (the worst of its faults is the killer CusackPoe is trying to stop), there were some things I did enjoy.  

1) The pet raccoon, Karl, to whom Poe feeds a human heart.  If you're going to reinvent a literary character, go bold.  And this is such a bizarre choice that I have to say, well done.  I wish the real Poe had a pet raccoon named Karl.  I would talk about that in every Poe lecture I gave.  And then, CusackPoe has a human heart he's been scientifically dissecting and allows Karl to to eat it.  I love that!

2) The music in the film was thrilling.

3) I thought Luke Evans as Inspector Fields was excellent.  For me, the best performance in the film.  I wish this film was just a 19th century murder mystery with Evans tracking down the killer.  I would have enjoyed that much more.  

4) Watching the murders from Poe's stories come to life was exciting.  I've read some other reviews that slammed the film's use of CGI, but I didn't notice during these scenes.  Watching the pendulum blade slice up the victim and being in the room where the women in Murders in the Rue Morgue are killed is lots of fun.  

5) Alice Eve is hot.

6) CusackPoe complaining about Longfellow.  That was a nice touch in the film that other lit historians and scholars will enjoy.  Also, the victim of the pendulum blade (whom I won't name so as not to spoil the fun) was an apt choice for the film and serves as a kind of in-joke (however, in my view of the movie, it's also an ironic choice).

 Ouch

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

The death of Poe has never been solved. The biographies are all unclear. Who's to say he wasn't a "drunk, drug-addled madman"? I interpret this movie much differently. As a writer who's creativity was undoubtably vast, Poe may have even liked this interpretation of his life. I am not a literary historian, and I admit I didn't know much about Poe prior to this movie. But after having watched it I became fascinated and researched all about him. I have begun to read some of his work even. So even if this movie did not portray Poe as u would have hoped, I think it has opened a door to the unknown of Poe for people who are not literary historians. Plus I think Cusack did a great job. And I also like the raccoon. It is ironic in a semi-morbid way (the rabies theory)

October 15, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterChrissy

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>